The relationship between traumatic experiences and the development of substance use disorders (SUDs) has been a subject of extensive research in the fields of psychology, psychiatry, and public health. Traumatic experiences, defined as events that involve actual or threatened death, serious injury, or sexual violence, significantly impact mental health. Other traumatic experiences, such as adverse childhood experiences, also increase the lifetime risk for developing a substance use disorder. This article explores the mechanisms through which trauma influences the onset and progression of SUDs, supported by current research and theoretical frameworks.
This link is especially important in American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations, both of whom have suffered historical and colonization trauma for centuries in a row. Substance use disorders in the AI/AN community will not be effective in the long run if they do not simultaneously address the impact of colonization trauma. At the same time, trauma work with AI/AN communities should occur within a trauma-informed framework, with the awareness that patients should be screened for potential co-morbid substance use, and that even in the event that co-morbid substance use disorders are not present, providing education and evidence about why trauma is indeed a risk factor for the development of substance use disorders. When appropriate, supporting local traditional practices, resilience practices, and intergenerational connections between the youth and elders is always of the utmost importance.
Understanding Trauma and Its Psychological Impact
Trauma can be categorized into acute trauma (resulting from a single incident), chronic trauma (repeated and prolonged events, such as domestic violence or abuse), and complex trauma (exposure to multiple traumatic events). These experiences disrupt healthy psychological functioning, leading to a range of symptoms and diagnoses, including post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, anxiety, and maladaptive coping mechanisms (van der Kolk, 2014).
The neurobiological impact of trauma is profound. Trauma alters brain structures and functions, particularly the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex, which are involved in emotional regulation, memory processing, and executive functioning (McEwen, 2012). Dysregulation in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and neurotransmitter systems further contributes to challenges with emotional regulation and susceptibility to substance use or mental health concerns.
Substance Use as a Means of Coping with Trauma
Individuals exposed to trauma often experience a wave of uncomfortable and challenging emotions, which can also include difficulty trusting and forming healthy relationships as a form of social support. Moreover, many people with trauma go undetected and undiagnosed, and may not have access to the mental health treatment that they need to heal. As a result, some individuals with trauma turn to substances because, for the first time, they experience relief from symptoms of their trauma (Khantzian, 1997). However, and often unbeknown to our patients, long term substance use typically exacerbates psychological distress and can lead to the development of SUDs.
Substance use provides temporary relief by altering neurotransmitter levels, particularly dopamine and serotonin, which enhance mood and provide a sense of euphoria. However, chronic use leads to neuroadaptations, increased tolerance, and dependency, making it difficult to cease use despite adverse consequences (Koob & Le Moal, 2008).
Trauma and the Pathway to SUDs
Research consistently demonstrates a strong association between trauma and SUDs. A meta-analysis by Dube et al. (2003) revealed that individuals with a history of childhood abuse are significantly more likely to develop alcohol and drug use disorders in adulthood. The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) study further corroborates these findings, indicating a dose-response relationship between the number of traumatic experiences and the risk of developing SUDs (Felitti et al., 1998).
Trauma contributes to SUDs through several pathways:
1. Psychological Dysregulation: Trauma cause fluctuations in healthy emotional regulation processes, leading to difficulties in managing stress and negative emotions as they may trigger prior conscious or unconscious memories or feelings surrounding the trauma. If substance use becomes a primary means of coping it may be reinforcing the cycle of abuse and dependency, and also may make it more likely that individuals develop new traumas associated with the substance use itself – for example, sexual or physical assaults while intoxicated, incarceration, homelessness, and other adverse experiences (Sinha, 2008).
2. Social and Environmental Factors: Traumatic experiences often occur in contexts of social instability, poverty, and familial dysfunction, which are risk factors for both trauma and substance use. The lack of social support and exposure to substance-using environments further increase vulnerability (Enoch, 2011).
3. Genetic and Epigenetic Factors: Genetic predispositions play a role in the vulnerability to both trauma and SUDs. Epigenetic changes resulting from trauma can alter gene expression, affecting stress response systems and increasing the likelihood of substance use (Heim & Binder, 2012).
4. Co-occurring Mental Health Disorders: Trauma frequently leads to comorbid mental health conditions such as PTSD, depression, and anxiety, which are independently associated with increased risk of substance use. The interplay between these disorders creates a complex clinical picture that complicates treatment (Brady et al., 2000).
Implications for Treatment and Intervention
Understanding the link between trauma and SUDs is crucial for developing effective treatment and intervention strategies. Trauma-informed care, which acknowledges the impact of trauma and incorporates this understanding into all aspects of service delivery, is essential (SAMHSA, 2014). Key components of trauma-informed care include:
1. Safety & Trustworthiness: Creating a safe and supportive environment that fosters trust between the patient and clinician.
2. Themes of Control: Individuals experiencing trauma often lament the fact they could not control what was occurring in their environment during the trauma. Therefore, the maximizing patient control, autonomy, and voice within their treatment is incredibly important as a means of improving outcomes.
3. Peer Support and Empowerment: Encouraging peer support and empowering individuals to take an active role in their recovery process.
4. Collaboration and Mutuality: Building collaborative relationships between patients and providers to promote shared decision-making.
5. Cultural, Historical, and Gender Issues: Recognizing and addressing the cultural, historical, and gender-specific aspects of trauma and substance use.
Integrated treatment approaches that address both trauma and substance use simultaneously are particularly effective. Cognitive-behavioral therapies (CBTs), such as Trauma-Focused CBT and Seeking Safety, have shown promise in treating co-occurring PTSD and SUDs (Najavits, 2002), and supplemental Motivational Interviewing can greatly improve outcomes in SUDs. Additionally, pharmacological interventions may be used to manage withdrawal symptoms and reduce cravings, facilitating engagement in therapy.
Conclusion
The link between traumatic experiences and the development of substance use disorders is well-established, with trauma acting as a significant risk factor for SUDs. Understanding the complex interplay of psychological, neurobiological, social, and genetic factors is essential for developing effective prevention and treatment strategies. Trauma-informed care and integrated treatment approaches offer promising avenues for addressing the dual challenges of trauma and substance use, ultimately improving outcomes for affected individuals.
References
1. Brady, K. T., Back, S. E., & Coffey, S. F. (2004). Substance abuse and posttraumatic stress disorder. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 13(5), 206-209.
2. Dube, S. R., Anda, R. F., Felitti, V. J., Chapman, D. P., Williamson, D. F., & Giles, W. H. (2003). Childhood abuse, household dysfunction, and the risk of attempted suicide throughout the life span: findings from the Adverse Childhood Experiences Study. JAMA, 286(24), 3089-3096.
3. Felitti, V. J., Anda, R. F., Nordenberg, D., Williamson, D. F., Spitz, A. M., Edwards, V., … & Marks, J. S. (1998). Relationship of childhood abuse and household dysfunction to many of the leading causes of death in adults: The Adverse Childhood Experiences (ACE) Study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 14(4), 245-258.
4. Koob, G. F., & Le Moal, M. (2008). Addiction and the brain antireward system. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 29-53.
5. Najavits, L. M. (2002). Seeking Safety: A Treatment Manual for PTSD and Substance Abuse. Guilford Press.
AUTHOR:
Shawn Singh Sidhu, MD, DFAPA, DFAACAP
Co-Medical Director, Vista Hill Foundation
Vista Hill Native American SmartCare Program